Community feedback

Use the drop-down menu to see posted items.

2 Responses to Community feedback

  1. Gaetan Royer says:

    Here are my speaking notes for the December 10, 2013 Council meeting

    Your worship and Council, my name is Gaetan Royer. I have lived in Port Moody for 14 years. I’m addressing item 6.1, specifically the recommendation to forward the OCP to the Committee Of the Whole.

    In most public consultation processes, the size of the crowd goes down over time. You make adjustments as the process unfolds. People become more comfortable with the outcome as their issues get dealt with.

    That’s what happened with many projects this Council has done. An example of that took place tonight with public hearings where the only comments were positive.

    The attendance at the OCP Town Hall meetings is getting bigger with each meeting. Letters and petitions keep coming. In a way, that’s great for democracy… But most people express their frustration and ask for changes. In my experience, this process is not headed for success.

    I suggest it’s time for you to give the OCP back to your planners. You have been making changes with very specific resolutions: “remove 30 storeys in Coronation Park” for example.

    So staff dutifully make those very specific changes. I think you need to take better advantage of your staff’s expertise.

    Instead of sending the OCP to the Committee Of the Whole, I suggest you give the process back to your Planning staff. Give them time to consult with neighbourhoods where people are divided. Give people time to explore more options.

    For example, the City has not organized any consultation specific to Coronation Park. These residents were bounced from 0 growth to 30 storeys back to 0 growth. No wonder, they’ve organized their own meetings based on those 2 extremes. Somewhere in between, there’s a solution. The City should help them find it.

    So I urge Council to give this process back to planning staff. Empower your planners to go back to work with specific neighbourhoods like Coronation Park and Moody Centre. Gaëtan Royer

  2. Gaetan Royer says:

    by Dan Ebenal – The Tri-City News
    posted Dec 12, 2013 at 10:00 AM— updated Dec 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM
    The latest draft of Port Moody’s official community plan is far from final.
    But it is certainly controversial.
    Echoes from a November town hall meeting on the planning document continued to reverberate through Port Moody’s Inlet Theatre Tuesday night.
    Gaetan Royer, the former PoMo city manager — and husband of Coun. Zoe Royer — made a presentation to council asking it to get staff more involved in the process.
    “You have been making changes with very specific recommendations, very specific resolutions,” he said.
    Royer said council should scrap plans to have the OCP go to the city’s committee of the whole for review in January and instead have staff consult with residents in neighbourhoods divided over the plan. He pointed to Coronation Park, which has “bounced from zero growth to 30 storeys back to zero growth.”
    Royer said switching between the two extremes has resulted in residents organizing their own meetings in the community to rally support for one of the factions.
    “Somewhere in between, there is a solution and I think the city should help the neighbourhood to discover that solution,” he said.
    Council moved ahead with plans for a Jan. 7 committee to review the OCP but those around the council table seemed receptive to obtaining further input from staff.
    Mayor Mike Clay said many of those voicing objections over the OCP are only opposed to a part of the plan that affects them specifically.
    “At the last meeting, there was what looked to be an angry mob of 350 people or so here,” Clay said, noting, “A number of people got up and said, ‘I support this plan generally except this aspect of it.'”
    But the mayor did agree that council has gotten far too specific with the OCP, something he says has chased a number of developers away. Clay said he has always supported removing potentially contentious areas like Coronation Park or the Mill and Timber site from the OCP and referring them to as a neighbourhood area plan that would require further consultation. He added that redevelopment of both the mill and Andre’s Wine sites would require approval from Metro Vancouver.
    “Those are just pipe dreams at this point, anyhow,” Clay said. “You’re describing a vision of what the community might look like.”
    The mayor took exception to comments that council is using the OCP to force changes on the community that it is not ready for.
    “The OCP doesn’t guarantee or enable anything to be built,” he said. “It’s a vision document.”
    He said council will now go over the input received from the community at the town hall meetings as well as through correspondence, make any necessary revisions and then go back before the public.
    “This stuff isn’t going to be built overnight. This is 30-year planning. If you don’t like the vision this council comes up with, then your referendum is when you go to the polls in November [2014 civic elections].”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s